New lease of life for carbon fiber reinforced plastics(2)

Ready to recycle

“CF recycling takes place in two stages: fiber recovery followed by recovered fiber use in a new application,” explains researcher Fanran Meng, who is working on the problem at the University of Nottingham. “Recycling techniques take different approaches to recovering fibers from the cross-linked thermoset matrix material, from mechanical size reduction to thermal processes, which partially or fully decompose matrix.”

The simplest means of recycling CFRPs is pyrolysis in which end-of-life composite material is shredded and then heated to high temperatures to burn off the polymer component. ELG Carbon Fibre has been operating the first and largest pyrolysis recycling plant in the West Midlands in the UK since 2009 [4,5]. The company is one of several around the world, in the US, Germany, Italy, and Japan, exploring the recovery of CF from manufacturing waste and end-of-life components [6].

The limitation of such recycling approaches is that the resulting fibers are short and form a jumbled mass, very different from the long aligned fibers required for high-performance composites. While short, jumbled rCFRPs are unsuitable for high-performance components, there are less technical applications in consumer goods like bikes or tennis rackets available.

Other recycling technologies in the pipeline, including chemical and fluidized bed processes, promise an attractive alternative producing higher-quality recycled fibers. Pioneered by Steve Pickering at the University of Nottingham, fluidized bed process is at the stage of transitioning from the lab to pilot-plant scale. Originally devised for recycling glass fiber, Pickering and his team have adapted the process over the last 5 years to recycle CF, with the support of Boeing. Waste material is first shredded (to 6-22 mm) before being fed into the fluidized bed reactor. A silica sand bed is used to volatize the material, decomposing the polymer matrix and releasing the fibers. Thanks to the fact that the silica bed retains all the contaminants, while the temperatures used in the reactor are not sufficient to damage the fibers, the process is particularly well suited to dealing with mixed waste or contaminated material.

Fluidized bed process has, its proponents believe, the ability to recover good quality fibers. Moreover, according to Meng, the team at Nottingham is working on incorporating alignment technologies into the reuse process so that higher quality composites can be produced from recycled fibers.

“Maintaining the mechanical properties of CF through the recycling processes is a key challenge in developing a commercial CF recovery process and trade-offs clearly exist between the competing recycling technologies,” says Meng. “Recycled CF may be applicable for non-structural applications where lightweighting is required such as automotive, construction, wind energy, and sports industries.”

Preserving the length of fibers during recycling, using wet papermaking techniques to create nonwoven mats of shorter fibers or fiber alignment processes to produce aligned mats of short fibers can yield rCFRPs that are almost as good as vCFPRs, and certainly good enough for some applications.

Energy and environmental benefits… at the right price

The technology to recycle CFRPs is starting to fall into place and the figures on the energy benefits of recycling CF seem to add up, according to the team at Nottingham, who has also been analyzing the economics of the process.

“Industry reports claim that the manufacture of rCF achieves about 95% energy reduction compared with vCF, for comparable mechanical performance,” points out Meng.

Overall, the researchers’ figures indicate that rCFRPs can reduce inherent greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by around 45% compared with vCFRPs, a substantial improvement on conventional waste treatment or mechanical recycling.

But no matter how compelling the energy and environmental benefits, the price has to be right – especially if rCFRPs are going to compete with conventional composites and lightweight materials – for large-scale adoption across the automotive and other mass-market sectors. The cost of vCF varies depending on the properties, from around $55/kg for standard civil engineering material to $1980/kg for high-end, high-spec fibers for more exacting aerospace applications [1,7].

“Our studies, at the University of Nottingham, indicate that the recovery of CF from CFRP wastes via fluidized bed process can be achieved at under $5/kg with energy savings of over 90%,” says Meng. “If large quantities of rCF can be used in future vehicle manufacture, these lightweight structures will achieve benefits of mass reduction, energy saving, GHG emissions reduction, and cost savings.”

Despite the challenges – in both technological and economic terms – the prospects for recycled CFRPs are starting to look attractive. As the first generation of CFRPs come to the end of their useful lives in larger volumes over coming decades, recycling could offer the attractive possibility of an almost closed cycle, whereby recovering CF from high-performance aerospace composites could drive the adoption of cheap rCFRPs in the automotive sector.

“The CF recycling industry is in its infancy at the moment,” says Meng, “but as more recycled CF becomes available and recycling technology develops, there is the potential to use rCF in higher value products, saving money and being more environmentally sustainable.”